Miss huff lantana

. Actress, Producing, Producing ex?tif am?caine N?Nicole Mary Kidman, June 20, 1967?onolulu, Hawa?(Etats-Unis) Although the n?aux United States, Nicole Kidman joined d?sa more tender childhood the contr?natale of his/her parents, Australia. It y d?uvre tr?jeune a v?table passion for the ballet dancing, before turning to the th?re which enables him to fight its timidit?D?ses sixteen years, the teenager leaves her?des in order to enti?ment devote?' dramatic art, and d?oche tr?vite its premi? appearance with the cin? in Bush Christmas, an Australian drama which meets some succ?dans the country. It continues there?ener its carri? before trying the Hollywood adventure: first of all while embarking in 1989 in the boat which cursed of Calms White (a thriller australo-am?cain), then by incarnating the ann?suivante the girl friend of Tom Cruise in film of action. Signal gun r?le besides d?rminante for the continuation of its carri?, contributing in?tablement?on rise. Are Apr?s'?e mari?en d?mbre 1990, both com?ens found in front of the camwood? of Ron Howard in the sentimental drama remote Horizons (1992), but which does not meet however the succ?esp?. Mischievousness (1993) which allows him interpr?r for the premi? time since its d?ts a dangerous manipulator. Does Nicole Kidman gain her premi?s r?mpenses gr.? with the character of Suzanne Stone, a woman v?le and go-getter in before encha?r with the troisi? shutter of the adventures of Batman in. The succ?critique one arrives with a performance plus intimist in but it remains however boud?par the public, successively in film of action the Peacemaker (1997) then in the fantastic com?e. Two films will enable him to become an actress of very first plan: the posthumous work of Stanley Kubrick, the?de of caract?s Eyes wide shut (1999) in which it does play?use MOD? and modern of. (2001), which allows him d?ocher its premi? nomination with the Oscars. Continuation?ne wound occurred on turning, it is however seen in the obligation to say not?avid Fincher for its thriller. Does Apr?un divorce resounding Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman Pr? its features?a m? of does strict family in fantastic film the Others (2001) and gain?ouveau large a succ? Nicole Kidman does not finish any any more accumulating the projects with large r?isateurs who tear off it, that it is Lars von Trier for the thriller Anthony Minghella for the drama of war Sydney Pollack for her thriller political. In 2005 the actress is of all the castings. She cumulates six projects of films, of which the adaptation of the s?e worship of the ann? 1960, Happy Feet, a film anim?ans which it Pr? its pretty stamp of voice. Fur: incarnates an imaginary portrait of Diane Arbus, o?lle the photographer Diane Arbus, one of best the repr?ntantes am?caines of the photography of the ann? 1960-70. Musical Com?e, the USA, 1h56mns Left in room the 22 ao?2007 (France), July 20, 2007 (the USA) physical Malgr?on passably rounded, the Tracy young person have only a id?en T? : to dance in the c?bre?ssion of Corny Collins. By chance, this last assists?ne its performances with the lyc?et proposes to him to come to join its?ipe. Does Tracy become instantan?nt a star, attracting itself m? blow jealousy of Amber, which r?ait up to now on the show. D?rmais in mare, its chances to face Amber during the finale and to gain the title of "Hairspray Miss" seem compromised well. Voil?n film which puts the p?e. The surprise was not less excellent. Is a gross bouff?de fra?or, completely kitsch?rendre with the second degr?il necessary to be let go d?le d?rt and it is happiness assur?La reconstitution of the ann? sixty is tr?r?sy. Beautiful work on the costumes, the d?rs and the tr?belle photograph with the hot colors and?atantes which accentuates C? acidul?e the unit. Is the band original formidable and gives desire for rising of sound if? and to dance?haque song. The sc?rio as?ui is much less l?r that it does not appear to with it. Subjects, which, forty years later are always of actualit?t will be it still unfortunately can?e for an end of time. Are the characters, nice or m?ants, all caricatural but whole and are never jug? But with-del?e is the whole that, it true that the premi? asset of film is John Travolta in. It is necessary applauds the superb work of the make-up men, who have r?is?n true prowess, it is all?ait cr?ble as a woman. With more de.15 kilos of costumes and silicone of the feet?a T?, it moves, dance and?lue with one dismaying facilit?La young Nicole Blonsky is formidable, for its first R? with the cin? it is a tr?bonne entr?en mati?. Returning Michelle Pfeiffer is it also perfect. A long ago that it had not been seen?areil F?, esp?ns what this R? its carri will start again?, a little tomb?dans the lapse of memory these derni?s ann?. Dr.?, entra?nt, inventive but quite as old-fashioned and kitsch, Hairspray are the film to?oir for?e of good mood. An excellent entertainment and one of the tr?bonne surprised?. To strongly advise to replace the sun which we miss in this moment. It is what this relation?ange which one calls the amiti?Cette history of love o?' one never sleeps together. How I can make good?es friendly. Do I have the right to intervene in their life under cover of the amiti?Et at the bottom, which is this feeling?ange which lives me when a friend needs me. Four years apr?P? and does wire (nomination in C?r of best first film), Michel Boujenah offer 3 friends to us a soft com?e amndt? on amiti?Ce HT? do exchange, entour?e some others, love, research of the roots, family, have D? ? trait?aintes time at the cin?. And for?? time, it has no surprise there nor innovation. The Sc setting? is traditional without imagination, serving a conventional sc?rio but well?it, m? if the psychological depth of the characters is not frankly creus? The th?s are thus universal but simple, with the result that one can stick without probl? with the protagonists. But it misses small something which makes that the?tion has evil?raiment transpara?e, it effleure right?eine. The interpr?tion is plut?de qualit?Annelise Hesme and Yves R?er is also tr?bien. A.noter the participation of Philippe Noiret D? well marqu?ar the disease and of which it is the last film. A R? short but Dr.?, o?' one can still see all the?ndue of its immense talent. Left in rooms the 15 ao?2007 (France), July 20, 2006 (Australia) Of Irish origin, Stewart Kane lives in Australia, in the small town of Jindabyne. Party with his/her three friends for a randonn?de p?e in the mountains, it d?uvre the corpse of a young woman in the rivi?. On are their return, they confront??a collar? and?' incompr?nsion of all the communaut?Cinq years apr?le impassioning and envo?nt Ray Lawrence returns a little avec.un film in the m? vein. With only trois.r?isations in twenty years one can say that it takes time. Just like in this new opus. In the two hours of film, it takes time to install the characters, the situations, the intrigue. Is the action thus slow m? a little long with the d?t, in any case at least until?e that the drama?ate. But that G? in nothing the int?t. Rather heavy environment d?le d?rt, Sc? of is opening m? tr?stressante. Then the atmosph? tr?particuli? what the r?isator before known instaur?ans Lantana returns and takes to us with the tripe until?a Sc? perturbing finale, which opens several possibilit? Is the psychology of the characters well d?nie, m? so less protagonists would not have harmed, the history has tendency?'?rpiller towards too many couples. F? whose culpabilit?' insinuates dans.des vies.ordinaires.par?nement not very ordinary is tr?bien d?it. It G? moreover much more the people who do not have assist?n there the occurrence the women of each four friend. In addition to the Sc setting? all carefully and without clash, photography is one of the essential?ments?a r?site film. Are the images absolutely splendid and the nature of this corner of Australia east one of the protagonists?art enti? history. Cheer also with the type-setter of the original band, music perfectly adapt? contribute?' environment. ?e can less intense and less fascinating than Lantana this film is less int?ssant. A true pleasure for the eyes and the ears. While not forgetting to make us r??ir on my human nature. Dramatic Com?e, France, 1h36mns When Antoine proposes?laire, its the best and only friend, of him pr?r of the money, it is far from imagining o?e will m?ra its promise. At will thirty years, it tra? a jalonn?de existence odd jobs and grosses gal?s. To hold its word, it has of another choice to only agree to replace its p?, travelling?cier, party in convalescent home apr?un infarction. Initially I must acknowledge it, I am especially to all?oir this film only for Nicolas Cazal?ue I am since. Thus without anything conna?e film or history. Who speaks simple people, of a simple family and compliqu?comme all the families, simple things and of nature. The sc?rio is thus?it simply. It goes?' essential without hustle nor useless dialogues. It follows the characters with more Pr? each one with their d?uts and their qualit? sans.pathos, without jugement.mais tr?justement. Their motivations and their actions are clear. All sounds true?el not that one would believe in a report for France 3 r?onale (l??' elsewhere worked the r?isator on identical subjects). Tourn? travelling?cery?a meets retrait?isol?dans the small villages are worth their heavy of gold. It is tr?dr? and besides humour is always pr?nt. One easily sticks?ous his characters, it is true that it is easy to be identified?' one or the other of the members of this family. One or more of the situations or the dialogues, are to us arriv?un day or the other within the family. With D? a R? enough consistent in the consistent not very. It is all?ait?' ease in the R? this wire, tr?naturel, thus tr?convaincant. A physique and a charisma which should tr?prochainement remake to speak about him. Clotilde Hesme is it also tr?bien. Fra?e, l?re, luminous, I have it pr?r?ci plut?que in. She also can pr?ndre?n beautiful future. Does two tr?beaux films?' post for it this ann? , habitu?aux seconds r?s (of m? and of large-m? especially), tr?dr? here. Some reproach film awkwardness and too large na?t?ais are not sulky our pleasure. Here one speaks above all about tenderness?tions, simplicit?t of love. Large a bouff?d' fresh air, of countryside and finer feelingss. A film authenticates which makes good. Left in rooms the 15 ao?2007 (France), June 22, a 2007 (the USA) new life starts for Evan Baxter, his Joan wife and their three sons. Fra?ement? d?t?e New York, and well d?d? to mark does the history of its country, the ex-pr?ntator high-speed motorboat require?ieu to help it?changer the world ", without suspecting that it has D? ? chosen for a mission of the highest importance. When the d?t?ong - one of the most influential men of Washington - proposes an alliance to him, the na?Baxter is convinced that its pri? has? heard. But of the?nements d?utants do not delay?emer the disorder in its family and within her fid? ?ipe. Why these pr?storic deliveries of tools and beams. Why this uninterrupted surge of birds and mammif?s of all esp?s which each day invades a little more the vicinity. And why Evan it believed oblig?e to exchange its costume for a long tunic. The verse?lo on the safeguard of the plan? is enfonc? large blows of burrins whereas Am?que is very m? the first pollutant of the world. Am?cains really do not miss air. Moreover is the religious message him also a little heavy?fait D? much for only one film. To pass is this report, it necessary to be armed with troisi? degr?Les sp?aux effects is plut?r?sis, that it is for the animals, the arch or the d?ge. The sc?rio is only marsh mallow, finer feelingss and it? of morals?d?uline of everywhere that that becomes about it almost?eurant. Moreover one wonders what Morgan Freeman comes to do in this kind of com?e, it m?te really better, the r?nt. Quant?teve Carell it is not better. Does this actor have so acid humour and so private individual, so much Dr.? and concerning in the pearl. ?it very of m? much more Dr.? and r?si. A com?e of? ?viter, if as in film you want?ter the shipwreck. Exits in rooms the 14 ao?2007 (France), April 6, 2007 (the USA). Of its C?, Cherry, go-go dancer, were made tear off the leg at the time of an attack. Wray, his/her ex-small buddy, takes care on it. But Cherry has?e with in vain most badly, it did not say its last word. While the patients multiply and become attackers enrag? Do cherry and Wray take T? of a arm?destin??mp?er the?d?e to be propagated. If million individuals is contamin?et much succumb, a poign?d' between them will fight until the end for r?gier in a place S? For meanly mercantile reasons it seems, us other poor europ?s had right?n twice?eux month of interval. In this lapse of time finally rather short, we do not have oubli?e film of. For me (and it is my only personal opinion. Are the two films completely diff?nts, on the level of the history well S? but more especially on the level of the rate/rhythm and the Sc setting?. Does this time the homage go to films of zombies, and it is certainly the best than one could find, a little as but in a style diff?nt (one thinks some times besides of it by seeing that-L? The Sc setting? of is Rodriguez rythm? tr?dante, innovating (m? if it copies the old one. One is not bored a minute and in more humour is really d?pant. Just like does Boulevard of death, a great care have? contribution? technique: the photograph always also "cheap" ann? 70, d?rs, costumes, the band. The casting is?lement?a height Pink McGowan (. Josh Brolin in m?cin inqui?nt) as a scientist, Tarantino him-coil in rapist and Bruce Willis by m?ant compl?nt this all?ante distribution. They all are formidable and give?oor joy of it. All these?ments assembl? Sc setting?, sc?rio, technique and interpr?tions, make of Plan? Terror a high entertainment colors and jubilatoire. Action, humour, death-alive?rendre with the troisi? degr?our a pleasure which one will not be sulky. And in d?aise with the fans of Tarantino this second s?ce of Grindhouse is the much better only premi?. Nothing?aire if is not to look at the ceiling. They are three: Marie, Anne, Floriane. In the secrecy of the cloakrooms their destinies cross and the d?r emerges. If the premi?s times is unforgettable it is because they do not have laws, puts out of Sc? its first film which?it makes of it its subject of end of?des of sc?rio. In taken well to him because the film is m? pr?nt? this ann?dans the section a certain glance and with the festival of romantic film of. For its d?ts derri? camwood? the young person cin?te shows large a ma?ise. Perfectly?it, it plunges us in the universe of three young teenagers of Cergy during holidays of? o?eurs lives will take a new turning. The history follows these three h??s to the more pr?de their feelings in?lution and only they three. The gar?s have a R? tr?secondaires, the parents and families miss, moreover they are never seen. Moreover one knows nothing of their lives, their stories and of what is pass?vant. It is right one moment suspended on the medium of? and in their adolescences. Malgr?uelques lengths without cons?ence, one follows with int?t their course in an environment tr?particuli?. Just like the volont?u sc?rio.de not to give any reference mark? temporal:.pas of t?phones portable, not of indications of ann?..Les images is beautiful but plut?sombres and the music, splendid, adhesive perfectly with the matter. Their destiny? thus will cross and between-m?r one moment. The cam?.les follows without voyeurism, judgement and clich? The three is h?ines jou? by three young really formidable actresses. Completely unknown, and due, Naissance of the octopuses is their first film, they are?uivre all the three. Perfect ma?ise l?ncore of the r?isatrice for the direction of actors, a premi? it is a r?site. Fact with tact and sensibilit?une premi? work intrigante and enthralling. A jeune.r?isatrice?uivre, with a truth talent.et which one awaits the continuation impatiently. For its new film Claude Chabrol?aire continues what it did always well: the portrait of a certain middle-class of province. Confrontation with other social classes is always also the center of these films, o???ut of m?nger they are always finished by d?uire mutually. The girl coup?en two?appe not?a r?e. However are all the ingr?ents of the good film chabrolien L? upper middle class of province, ambitious girl, loves, sex, meurtres.Le probl? is that the couples are not cr?bles. Whether it is Berl?d/Sagnier or Sagnier/Magimel. All sounds a little false, one never includes/understands the motivations of the characters and Gabrielle passes from a man?' other with a facilit??ncertante. There would be aim?lus the corrosive one, more acidit?un little as in films of the Sc setter? ann? 70/80. Here one follows m?ventures of the characters without d?aisir but without much pleasure either. The history is of tr?pr?sible, one per?t tr?vite that the rivalit?ntre the two men is likely to turn to the drama. The principal asset of film thus remains the interpr?tion. It litt?lement irradiates and illuminates its pr?nce. It incarnates?erveille the fragilit?la frankness, the na?t?t the fra?or who caract?se Gabrielle his character. A.l' I reverse do not have trouv?eno?Magimel tr?bon. It is little cr?ble, surjoue and in fact of the tons. At much better Chabrol it?it in. Fran?s Berl?d is?l?ui-m?. It is m? enough curious to see it as a perverse s?ctor and manipulator like it appara?ici. Beautiful return for Mathilda May which, twenty years apr? find its r?isator of whom was worth?' to him?que C?r of best the hope f?nin and which had disappeared since some ann?. Mention sp?ale?aroline Sihol which incarnates with class the m? antipathetic and tr?coinc?de Magimel. Rare actress with the cin?, she?it there is little, seizing resemblance in the tr?court R? of. Miss coh?on, of cr?bilit?de passion (for a crime passionnel a roof. Left in rooms on July 26, 2006 (France), July 7, 2005 (Germany) Recherch?ar all the police forces, the killer in s?e Gabriel Engel is arr? at the time of a spectacular op?tion. A policeman of small a localit?e province requires to?ouvoir to question it. It thinks that it could?e before the author of the murder of a young girl occurred one year and esp? to obtain consents of its share. It is far from imagining what awaits it. And indeed it holds all its promises. The sc?rio holds us in breath gr.? ?n latent suspense?uffant but and which goes up crescendo. The atmosph? is tr?glauque all length?el not that that becomes unhealthy about it. Are some sc?s and dialogues m? ?a limit insupportable. But tr?peu of things is montr?tout is to us plut?sugg? and that is only more effective. Malgr?out the end leaves a little??rer, the happy end?' am?caine comes a little to tarnish but not enough for g?er the unit. The action is slow but corresponds well?' history and?' environment. The interpr?tion is of qualit?e the share of the whole of this German casting in?t for us. A thriller cold, icy, d?ngeant, in any case which does not leave indiff?nt. The Nanny Diaries - the Newspaper of a baby-sitter Soon on Cin?e Fred: March. To find an article of the blog easily, click the sushi HERE Thursday - the blog of Oscar the duck. This blog is h?rg?ur AlloCin?logs:. The contents of this blog are publi?ous only the responsabilit?e its author. If the contents of this blog are shocking or illicit. technology of publication of blog and platform of blogs in white mark Blogomaniac French-speaking directory of blogs and search engine of blogs Blogonautes.